11/19/2023 0 Comments Spamsieve quot10.6.8![]() ![]() Subject: Designer Footwear from Gucci Prada Chanel & More, buy direct, forget department store prices I’m reverting back to 2.6.5 to see if the problem persists. This seems to have started when I upgraded to 2.6.6. The solution caters to Mac email clients and over its 17 years in operation has won the praise of its loyal clientele. That’s why C-command designed SpamSieve as a robust defense against unwanted and potentially harmful spam messages. I looked at my whitelist and saw a number of very suspicious addresses on it, which make me think SS has missed more of the false negatives I’ve trained manually. SpamSieve helps Mac users filter junk mail and phishing scams. But SS has no record of my marking it, so it kept the address in the whitelist and let other spams with that address through. I mark all spam that gets through as false positives, and I specifically remember marking this one, as I thought the subject was particularly weird. ![]() The log shows Spam Sieve marking it as good, but there’s no entry that shows where I marked it as a false positive. Notice the entries for, the subject wonyun. I’ve reproduced an example from my log below. It looks like SpamSieve is sometimes not acknowledging when I train a false positive. I dug through my log and I noticed something strange. Before I might get one a day in my inbox, but now I’m seeing six or seven, sometimes more. Over the past few weeks Spam sieve has been letting more spam through than it has been. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |